The Fourth Marriage

Wine Vs. Water

Wine v/s Water

Is Hell Endothermic or Exothermic? 

I recently found and interesting article...Is Hell
Exothermic or Endothermic? For those engineers,
scientist especialy chemist...try askin' yourself
that question!! business students or other majors
can answer it too if you want =)

ok.. when u done thinking of it.. or dont really
give it a damn..LOL... try readin' the article
then.. I hope it gives you a wee bit knowledge about hell

here's the article:

Dr. Schambaugh, of the University of Oklahoma
School of Chemical Engineering, Final Exam
question for May of 1997. Dr. Schambaugh is 
known
for asking questions such as, "why do airplanes
fly?" on his final exams. His one and only final
exam question in May 1997 for his Momentum, 
Heat
and Mass Transfer II class was: "Is hell
exothermic or endothermic? Support your answer
with proof."

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs
using Boyle's Law or some variant. One student,
however, wrote the following:

"First, We postulate that if souls exist, then
they must have some mass. If they do, then a mole
of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate
are souls moving into hell and at what rate are
souls leaving? I think we can safely assume that
once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave.

Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for souls
entering hell, let's look at the different
religions that exist in the world today. Some of
these religions state that if you are not a member
of their religion, then you will go to hell. Since
there are more than one of these religions and
people do not belong to more than one religion, we
can project that all people and souls go to hell.
With birth and death rates as they are, we can
expect the number of souls in hell to increase
exponentially.

Now, we look at the rate of change in volume
in hell. Boyle's Law states that in order for the
temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same,
the ratio of the mass of souls and volume needs to
stay constant. Two options exist:

1. If hell is expanding at a slower rate
than the rate at which souls enter hell, then the
temperature and pressure in hell will increase
until all hell breaks loose.
2. If hell is expanding at a rate faster
than the increase of souls in hell, then the
temperature and pressure will drop until hell
freezes over. 

So which is it? If we accept the quote given
to me by Theresa Manyan during Freshman year,
"that it will be a cold night in hell before I
sleep with you" and take into account the fact
that I still have NOT succeeded in having sexual
relations with her, then Option 2 cannot be
true...Thus, hell is exothermic."

The student, Tim Graham, got the only A.

I have arrived in Jakarta

Sooooooo hot over here. Well, I almost not made it. My flight to Newark was delayed 3 hours. The reason for the delay was congested air-traffic in Newark. Good thing I made it on time for the flight to Singapore, even though my suitcases did not quite make it.

Well, I have to say... I do kinda miss Boston. I miss the people rather. I hope you all are doing fine and well. Yeah, I'll try to plan my trip for Boston soon. In the mean time, if anybody wants to visit Indo.... please do come. DO NOT BRING DRUGS  <Recent International Incident>

Till then..... Stay in touch

English --- Asylum for the Verbally Insane Author unknown
 

 

We'll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes, but the plural of ox became oxen not oxes.

One fowl is a goose, but two are called geese, yet the plural of moose should never be meese.

You may find a lone mouse or a nest full of mice, yet the plural of house is houses, not hice.

If the plural of man is always called men, why shouldn't the plural of pan be called pen?

If I spoke of my foot and show you my feet, and I give you a boot, would a pair be called beet?

If one is a tooth and a whole set are teeth, why shouldn't the plural of booth be called beeth?

Then one may be that, and three would be those, yet hat in the plural would never be hose, and the plural of cat is cats, not cose.

We speak of a brother and also of brethren, but though we say mother, we never say methren.

Then the masculine pronouns are he, his and him, but imagine the feminine, she, shis and shim.

Let's face it - English is a crazy language.

There is no egg in eggplant nor ham in hamburger; neither apple nor pine in pineapple.

English muffins weren't invented in England.

We take English for granted.

But if we explore its paradoxes, we find that quicksand can work slowly, boxing rings are square, and a guinea pig is neither from Guinea nor is it a pig.

And why is it that writers write but fingers don't fing, grocers don't groce and hammers don't ham?

Doesn't it seem crazy that you can make amends but not one amend?

If you have a bunch of odds and ends and get rid of all but oneof them, what do you call it?

If teachers taught, why didn't preachers praught?

If a vegetarian eats vegetables, what does a humanitarian eat?

Sometimes I think all the folks who grew up speaking English should be committed to an asylum for the verbally insane.

In what other language do people recite at a play and play at a recital?

We ship by truck but send cargo by ship.

We have noses that run and feet that smell.

And how can a slim chance and a fat chance be the same, while a wise man and a wise guy are opposites?

You have to marvel at the unique lunacy of a language in which your house can burn up as it burns down,

in which you fill in a form by filling it out,

and in which an alarm goes off by going on.

So if Dad is Pop, how come Mom isn't Mop?